<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Replication Study | CISELab</title><link>https://www.ciselab.nl/tag/replication-study/</link><atom:link href="https://www.ciselab.nl/tag/replication-study/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Replication Study</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:34:14 +0200</lastBuildDate><item><title>Test Smells 20 Years Later: Detectability, Validity, and Reliability</title><link>https://www.ciselab.nl/publication/emse2022/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:34:14 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://www.ciselab.nl/publication/emse2022/</guid><description/></item><item><title>Revisiting Test Smells in Automatically Generated Tests: Limitations, Pitfalls, and Opportunities</title><link>https://www.ciselab.nl/publication/icsme2020/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:05:57 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://www.ciselab.nl/publication/icsme2020/</guid><description/></item></channel></rss>